AI Workshop Facilitator
Expert in AI for legal marketing and business strategy.
đź’¬ 20+ Chats
Use This GPTđź“ť Builder Details
- Name: Michael McGinn (View More GPTs By This Builder)
đź‘‹ Welcome Message
- Welcome to AI Workshop Facilitator, your ally in legal marketing AI!
đź’ˇ Prompt Starters
- Provide me with some ideas on how generative AI can help enhance our Business Development research efforts
- Tell me how AI can help us generate SEO elements based on our content
- Using the following examples for context, please provide me with a similarly structured Bulletin based upon the information I enter in the next prompt: Bulletin Example 1: Indigenous Equity in Energy and Infrastructure Projects in Canada Indigenous equity in energy/infrastructure projects is a tangible example of economic reconciliation, but what does that look like? As reported in our prior bulletin, "Four Trends in Indigenous Equity Participation in Canada", we have been monitoring reports of Indigenous equity participation in energy and related infrastructure projects to see how these investments and projects are evolving. We know that Indigenous equity investments in energy and related infrastructure projects are key towards advancing economic reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in whose treaty and traditional territories such projects are located. They are also key for managing project risk by helping to align the interests of the parties and facilitating Indigenous support and consent for a project. Based upon our data compiled to date[1], we note that the most Indigenous equity investments in this sector are in hydroelectric (31%) and wind (30%) energy generation projects, followed by solar energy generation projects (19%) and energy transmission projects (8%), including electricity transmission lines and pipelines. Investments in natural gas (5%) and energy storage (2%) projects are much less common, while about 5% of investments are in other energy or related infrastructure projects. We are watching to see how these numbers will develop. Over the next few years, we expect to see increasing numbers in energy storage and green or renewable energy and hydrogen projects. We also note that the most Indigenous equity investments in this sector are in Ontario (36%) and British Columbia (23%), followed by Alberta and Nova Scotia (each with 10%) and Quebec (9%). Only four provinces accounted for almost 80% of the aggregate number of energy and infrastructure projects with Indigenous equity participation. Each of Saskatchewan (5%), New Brunswick (4%), Manitoba (2%), and Yukon (1%) were 5% or less and just over 12% in the aggregate. Over the next few years, we would expect Alberta to gain some ground as a result of its loan guarantee program that enables Indigenous communities to access capital, which has proven to be quite successful in facilitating such transactions to date. If (or when) programs become available in other jurisdictions that include loan guarantees or other financing solutions to enable Indigenous communities to access capital at reasonable rates, we would expect to see increasing numbers in those jurisdictions as well, while an effective federal program might help to distribute such projects more evenly across the country. It is also important to note that we have not considered the size of the project or amount of investment in these figures, which at upper levels we expect would also be highly dependent on programs facilitating access to capital. Finally, our analysis indicates that over half (52%) of the projects have a minority (or less than 50%) Indigenous equity interest in the project. The number of projects with a majority (over 50%) Indigenous equity interest in the project (including projects that are 100% Indigenous owned) is 28%, while 20% have an equal (or 50%) Indigenous equity interest in the project. Almost half (48%) of the projects where such figures are reported have at least equal, if not majority, Indigenous equity ownership. We think it will be interesting to see how these numbers develop over the next few years, with the expectation that the number of reported projects with equal or majority Indigenous equity ownership will become more common than those with a minority Indigenous equity interest. Refer to Fasken’s Energy in Transition page for more thought leadership content. [1] Our analysis is based solely on publicly available information that we have reviewed regarding transactions involving Indigenous ownership in energy and related infrastructure projects, and does not necessarily reflect an exhaustive analysis of all such transactions. Given the limited information available, it is likely that some of these observations are not statistically significant. Bulletin Example 2: PMPRB Publishes Scoping Paper in Preparation for Upcoming Guidelines Consultations The PMPRB released the Scoping Paper for the consultations on the Board's Guidelines. On November 10, 2023, the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) released the Scoping paper for the consultations on the Board's Guidelines (the "Scoping Paper"), which outlines themes and questions to inform the upcoming industry consultation on the development of new guidelines. To participate in the Round Table, complete the Policy Roundtable Registration Form before November 24th. Background The amendments to the Patented Medicines Regulations (“Regulations”), came into force on July 1, 2022. The Regulations increased the number of comparators from seven to 11 countries (PMPRB11) and reduced reporting requirements for medicines believed to be at the lowest risk of excessive pricing. Now, the PMPRB is gearing up to operationalize these changes in new guidelines, while cementing its stated commitment to modernize and simplify its administrative framework. The PMPRB’s previous draft guidelines were never implemented. We reported on this update in our bulletin, "The 2022 PMPRB Outlook for Pharmaceutical Patentees in Canada". In the meantime, the PMPRB’s Interim Guidance, issued on August 18, 2022, remains in place, which benchmarks prices of new medicines to the median international price of the PMPRB11. The Scoping Paper is intended to inform the consultation process to develop the new guidelines, by outlining themes and questions for stakeholder feedback — it does not articulate the PMPRB’s position. The PMPRB intends to subsequently release a What We Heard Document in early 2024. The themes of the Scoping Paper are summarized below. Theme 1: Efficient Monitoring of Prices Without Price Setting The purpose of the guidelines is to explain the criteria staff will consider in determining whether the price of a patented medicine warrants an investigation, but the Scoping Paper acknowledges that not every patented medicine warrants the time an effort of a hearing. In light of this, the PMPRB wants to develop an administrative review that allows the monitoring of cases for potential excessive pricing. The Scoping Paper poses questions on how to best provide transparency in how staff analyses price information, so that rights holders will be able to evaluate the risk of a hearing. For example, what elements of the previous guidelines should be retained? Should medicines continue to be classified by therapeutic class? How should the PMPRB weigh each factor? The PMPRB also evaluates and compares the pricing of patented medicines in Canada with other international markets. The Scoping Paper asks: what price levels should be used as a triage measure [e.g. highest international price (HIP) or median international price (MIP)]? How should the PMPRB deal with medicines that have few or no international prices? What about an expedited review based on low international prices? Theme 2: Transition to PMPRB11 – New Versus Existing Medicines As we mentioned, the comparator countries in the Regulations changed to the PMPRB11. The change required that all information has to be filed using the PMPRB11, regardless of the original date of introduction of the medicine (i.e., before or after July 1, 2022). The Scoping Paper asks if the guidelines ought to distinguish between medicines that existed before the introduction, and how to approach existing medicines with prices above the PMPRB11. For context, the previous and draft guidelines distinguished the investigational triggers for new and existing medicines. Theme 3: Price Reviews during Product Life Cycle The PMPRB’s duty to monitor excessive pricing extends during the duration of the patent or certificate of supplementary protection. The Scoping Paper poses related questions about the frequency of, and the criteria used to trigger, price reviews, how to adapt factors according to the lifecycle of the medicine, the consideration of the Consumer Pricing Index and the timing for scientific review and therapeutic comparator identification. Theme 4: Investigations and Referral to Hearing As in Theme 1, the guidelines will continue to provide criteria that are assessed to trigger an investigation, such as price ceilings. This transparency allows rights holders to better assess the risk of being considered for a hearing. The Scoping Paper inquires into what criteria from the old guidelines should be kept, how much detail the new guidelines should provide, and if undertakings an appropriate mechanism for investigation closure. Theme 5: Relation to Pan-Canadian Health Partners, Insurers (Private and Public); And Alignment With Broader Government Initiatives The PMPRB intends to harmonize its priorities and objectives with other health partners in the Canadian pharmaceutical landscape. According to the PMPRB, the new guidelines present an opportunity to better coordinate and support existing regulatory and pricing bodies, as well as initiatives from federal, provincial and territorial governments. The Scoping Paper prompts stakeholders to consider what efficiencies could be gained by this coordination, and how the PMPRB can optimize its presence within the current ecosystem. Theme 6: Engaging With Patients, Health Practitioners, Pharmacy, and Other Stakeholders The objective of this theme is to seek feedback from stakeholders who are not rights holders by inquiring into their experience with the pricing of medicines, the role of the PMPRB in their decision-making, and how the PMPRB can better engage them. Upcoming Roundtable and Written Submissions The PMPRB is inviting stakeholders to participate in a Policy Round Table, informed by the themes we have discussed, on December 5 (English session) and December 6 (French session). To participate in the Round Table, complete the Policy Roundtable Registration Form before November 24th. While there are a limited number of available spots to register for in-person attendance, all interested persons can register to participate online. Interested parties can make representations at the Round Table, or by way of written submission due on December 20th. Activity Key Dates Policy Roundtable – English Session December 5, 2023 Policy Roundtable – French Session December 6, 2023 Deadline for registration to participate in the Roundtable November 24, 2023 Deadline for Written Submissions December 20, 2023 What we Heard Report Early 2024 Fasken continues to monitor all PMPRB developments, and our pricing strategy team is available to discuss your consultation submission. Bulletin Example 3: Delaware’s Corporate Opportunity Waiver Comes to Canada: Takeaways for U.S. Private Equity and Cross-Border M&A Canada moves closer to Delaware for Private Equity and Venture Capital investment. Has Canada just become an even friendlier destination for U.S. private equity, venture capital and other investors? It's not unusual for Canadian courts to look to Delaware caselaw for guidance, particularly in M&A disputes. It's much less common for Canadian legislators to take a page out of Delaware’s statutory playbook. But this recently occurred when Alberta adopted Delaware’s corporate opportunity waiver into the province’s Business Corporations Act. Writing in The M&A Lawyer (PDF, 175 KB), we explore the practical implications of this noteworthy development for U.S. cross-border investment into Canada, including by private equity, venture capital and other investors.
- Using the following examples for context, please provide me with a similarly structured biography ( focusing on consistent tone and language)based upon the information I provide in the next prompt: Biography Example 1: Nabila Abdul Malik | Trade, Investment & Disputes Lawyer in Ottawa | People | Fasken Nabila Abdul Malik practises predominantly in the areas of civil and commercial litigation, international and domestic arbitration, white collar crime, Nabila Abdul Malik practises predominantly in the areas of international arbitration, commercial litigation, international trade and investment as well as white collar defence. Her breadth of experience and knowledge across multiple jurisdictions enable her to assist clients in a myriad of commercial contexts. Nabila obtained her law degree from the University of Oxford and her master’s degree in law from Columbia University in New York. She is called to the Bar in four jurisdictions across three different continents. Nabila has a broad commercial litigation and arbitration practice, with clients benefiting from her exceptional legal background, breadth of experience and knowledge of a wide range of laws, policies and practices. In the course of her varied legal career, she has represented corporations, investors and sovereign States before courts and tribunals, and provides legal advice in relation to a broad spectrum of issues and a wide variety of industries. Prior to joining Fasken, she was a prosecutor at the Attorney General’s Chambers of Malaysia, where she was involved in extradition, bail and habeas corpus proceedings before the courts. She also provided legal advice as federal legal counsel to the government of Malaysia, and represented the government in civil matters before the courts. Nabila has worked at an international arbitration law firm, where she acted as counsel in numerous international arbitration proceedings, both commercial and investment, conducted under various arbitration rules including ICSID, UNCITRAL, ICC, SIAC, LCIA and DIAC. She has also worked at the Central Bank of Malaysia, where she was involved in the Financial Sector Assessment Programme under the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and was part of the trade negotiations team, in charge of the financial services chapter of the Malaysia-European Union FTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. She also worked on a collaboration with the Malaysian Competition Commission in the implementation of competition law in the financial sector. Nabila interned at the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Geneva, Switzerland, where she assisted in providing legal advice and support to WTO dispute settlement panels. She also interned at the United Nations (UN) Secretariat in New York, where she worked on cases before the UN Dispute Tribunal and the UN Appeals Tribunal. In addition, Nabila has represented Malaysia in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) task force on enhancing its dispute settlement mechanism. She was also a member of the OIC task force on establishing an arbitration centre in Istanbul, Turkey. *In England and Wales, providing legal services that are not reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act 2007. Biography Example 2: Thomas Barlow - Infrastructure & PPP (P3) lawyer in Toronto | People | Fasken W. Thomas Barlow is a founding member, and former Leader/Chair of the firm’s infrastructure & projects and municipal, land use planning & property tax practice W. Thomas Barlow* is a founding member, and former Leader/Chair of the firm’s infrastructure & projects and municipal, land use planning & property tax practice groups. He is ranked by Lexpert as Repeatedly Recommended for Infrastructure Law. He is a founding member of Fasken’s national security, procurement, government relations & strategy, and political law practice groups. He also has broad expertise in dispute resolution, with extensive experience acting for public and private sector clients in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), administrative tribunal and court proceedings. Tom’s practice combines a strong counsel background in business, commercial and administrative law matters with a sensitivity to policy considerations and specialized experience in his areas of practice. Tom has led and advised on numerous infrastructure, project finance and PPP projects and other procurements in multiple jurisdictions and sectors over many years, for authorities, bidders and consortium members, including developers, constructors, operators, and lenders. He is currently acting on matters involving the procurement and provision of public services, systems and infrastructure, both in Canada and internationally. Efficiently balancing public and private interests and risks, Tom has been integral to the development and implementation of new infrastructure procurement models, including progressive projects, since the earliest PPP projects in Canada. Recent examples include acting for Infrastructure Ontario and Metrolinx on the Ontario Line Subway Project, the Weeneebayko Area Health Authority and Infrastructure Ontario on its Redevelopment Project, and the Government of Canada and the Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority on the Gordie Howe International Bridge Project, which has been awarded recognition by Lexpert, Project Finance International and Project Finance & Infrastructure Journal (IJ Global) IJ and the Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships. The Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships and other industry organizations have recognized many of the public-private projects on which he has acted, several of which have been named “Deals of the Year.” Tom has advised on municipal and community infrastructure development, land use and financing in the local and regional contexts, including First Nations and community benefits. As part of his municipal, regulatory and administrative law practice, Tom has also provided advice on planning law, municipal assessment and taxation, applications and approvals, by-law interpretation and other municipal and compliance matters as well as national security issues related to infrastructure. He has frequently negotiated with or represented municipalities and public agencies across Ontario, as well as representing clients before administrative boards and tribunals. Tom’s practice has also included representing clients on matters pending before courts at all levels in Ontario, at the Federal Court and in the Supreme Court of Canada. Tom is a former Big Brother of the Year for Etobicoke and has been actively involved in community and public service throughout his career, including both professional and charitable organizations. Tom is an instructor in the Clayton H. Riddell Graduate Program in Political Management at Carlton University. Tom was appointed King's counsel by order of the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario in 2023. The King’s Counsel designation is given to lawyers who have demonstrated a commitment to the pursuit of legal excellence in service to the Crown, the public and their communities. *Practising through a professional corporation Selected Client Work Projects Ontario Line – Rolling Stock, Systems, Operations and Maintenance Project, Southern Civil, Stations and Tunnel Project, Pape Tunnel and Underground Stations Project and Elevated Guideway and Stations Project – Advising Infrastructure Ontario and Metrolinx on this ongoing project to design, build, finance, operate and maintain the Ontario Line Subway Weeneebayko Area Health Authority (WAHA) Redevelopment Project – Advised WAHA and Infrastructure Ontario on this ongoing project for the construction of a new hospital, Elder Care Lodge, visitor hostel and staff accommodations in Moosonee and a new Ambulatory Care Centre on Moose Factory Island which, once completed, will support WAHA in providing exceptional, culturally sensitive healthcare to patients and clients living along Ontario’s James Bay and Hudson Bay coasts, many of whom are Indigenous Gordie Howe International Bridge Project in construction between Canada and the United States – Advising the Government of Canada and the Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority in connection with the ongoing Gordie Howe International Bridge Project, a bridge crossing between Windsor, Ontario and Detroit, Michigan Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority achieves financial close – Advised the Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada in connection with the procurement, project agreement and commercial/financial close for the Gordie Howe International Bridge Project Regina Bypass Project – Advised lenders for the design, building, financing, maintenance, and reconstruction of the largest project of its kind in the history of Saskatchewan Federal Government of Canada reaches financial close on its contract for their Long-Term Accommodation Project with Plenary Properties – Counsel to the Federal Government of Canada, Defence Construction Canada, Department of Justice and Communications Security Establishment Canada, Canada’s national cryptologic agency, providing the Government of Canada with information technology security and foreign signals intelligence, for its Long-Term Accommodation Project with Plenary Properties London Ontario hospital redevelopment projects valued at US$261 million achieve financial close – Advised Infrastructure Ontario in financial close for the building and financing of two redevelopment projects in London, Ontario for US$261 million Henderson General Hospital Project reaches financial close on US$259 million redevelopment - Advised Infrastructure Ontario and Hamilton Health Sciences on a US$259 million redevelopment of Henderson General Hospital Transports Québec announces completion of Autoroute 25 Under P3 Agreement – Advised Transports Québec in respect of the setting up of the Québec Government's first ever public-private partnership Reported Cases Arsenault v. Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 1663 (CanLII) McEwing v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 525 (CanLII); 2013 FC 183 (CanLII) Brantford (City) v. Montour, 2013 ONCA 560 (2013 CarswellOnt 12669) Bielli v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 953, 2013 CF 953 (2013 CarswellNat 7548) Opitz v. Wrzesnewskyj, [2012] 3 SCR 76, 2012 SCC 55 (CanLII); 2012 ONSC 2873 (CanLII) PC Ontario Fund v. Essensa, 2012 ONCA 531 (CanLII); 2012 ONCA 453 (CanLII); 2011 ONSC 2641 (CanLII); 2010 ONSC 6799 (CanLII) Judicial Recount Arising out of the 41st General Election in the Electoral District of Etobicoke-Centre (Re), 2011 ONSC 3652 Exchange Corp Canada Inc v. Mississauga (City), 2011 ONSC 6768, 91 MPLR (4th) 121 Paul Sadlon Motors Inc v. General Motors of Canada Ltd, 2011 ONSC 4650, 204 ACWS (3d) 757 (Div. Ct.) Imperial Parking Canada Corp v. Toronto (City), 2007 ONCA 649, [2007] OJ No 3578, 160 ACWS (3d) 718. Judicial Recount Arising out of the 39th General Election in the Electoral District of Parry Sound (Re), 2006 CanLII 6914 (ON SC) Canadian Waste Services Inc v. North Bay (City), 107 ACWS (3d) 553, 21 MPLR (3d) 38 (Ont. S.C.J.) 1098748 Ontario Ltd v. Ontario Property Assessment Corp Region No 11, 2001 ONSC, 103 ACWS (3d) 661, 198 DLR (4th) 139 (Div. Ct.) Fink v. R, 1999, 99 DTC 582 (Tax Court of Canada) 1016338 Ontario Ltd v. North York (City), 1995 ONSC, 43 MPLR (2d) 276, 43 OTC 385, 73 ACWS (3d) 333. Canada Colors & Chemicals Ltd v. Tenneco Canada Inc, 1993 ONSC, 17 CPC (3d) 44, 41 ACWS (3d) 495, 4 W.D.C.P. (2d) 441. Comaplex Resources International Ltd v. Schaffhauser Kantonalbank, 1991 ONSC, 2 WDCP (2d) 524, 5 CPC (3d) 180, 84 DLR (4th) 343. Imperial Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Sanderlea Corp, [1991] OJ No 2705, 22 RPR (2d) 290. Peaker v. Canada Post Corp., [1989] C.L.D. 542, 13 A.C.W.S. (3d) 248, 68 O.R. (2d) 8 General Accident Assurance Co. of Canada v Lornex Mining Corp, 1988 ONSC 40 BLR 299, 66 OR (2d) 783. Weenies Inc v. 364558 Ontario Ltd, [1988] OJ No 1805, 12 ACWS (3d) 204 (C.A.) Mills-Hughes v. Raynor, 1988 38 BLR 211, 47 DLR (4th) 381, 63 OR (2d) 343 (C.A.) Re: An Act to Amend the Education Act (1986), 53 O.R. (2d) 513 (C.A.) Copenhagen Handelsbank A/S v. Peter Makos Furs Ltd, 1984 ONSC, 27 ACWS (2d) 437, 28 BLR 26, 46 CPC 21. Dominion Securities Ames Ltd v. Deep, 1984, 26 ACWS (2d) 207, 4 OAC 386 (C.A.) Recognized in the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory in Infrastructure Law, Lexpert 2018 to 2023 Recognized in the 2021 Lexpert Special Edition - Infrastructure , Lexpert 2021 For Infrastructure and Projects, The Legal 500 Canada 2018 to 2019 2021 Lexpert Recognized in the 2021 Lexpert Special Edition - Infrastructure The Lexpert Special Edition: Infrastructure profiles Lexpert-ranked lawyers whose focus is in Infrastructure and relevant practice areas 2018 to 2019 The Legal 500 Canada For Infrastructure and Projects Advised on the Ontario Government’s accelerated build pilot program regarding the construction of long-term care homes, Windsor-Detroit Bridge Authority achieves financial close Gordie Howe International Bridge Project, City of Brantford v. Detlor et al., 2013 ONCA 560, First Quantum announces successful completion of the C$5.1 billion offer for Inmet, Opitz v. Wrzesnewskyj et. al., Sadlon Motors Incorporated v. General Motors of Canada Limited, 2011 ONSC 2628 (S.C.J.), Federal Government of Canada reaches financial close on its contract for their Long-Term Accommodation Project with Plenary Properties, London Ontario hospital redevelopment projects valued at US$261 million achieve financial close, Henderson General Hospital Project reaches financial close on US$259 million redevelopment, Education LLB University of Western Ontario 1981 Granted admittance to law school after attendance for two years Queen's University Memberships & Affiliations Member, Canadian Bar Association Member, Ontario Bar Association June 3, 2015 The Public-Private Partnership Law Review - Canada Chapter Book November 1, 2012 Project Finance - Jurisdictional Comparisons 2012 Article March 10, 2010 P3? Yes you can, and Canada can help: Lessons for creating successful public-private partnerships from our neighbor Rebuilding America's Infrastructure Biography Example 3: Sylvie Hébert | Senior Director of Knowledge Management in Montreal | People | Fasken Sylvie Hébert is a lawyer and the seinor director of knowledge management in Montreal. Sylvie Hébert is the firm's Senior Director of Knowledge Management and is a member of our firmwide Knowledge and Practice Innovation team. In this role, she leads the implementation of the firm’s knowledge management strategies to support the efficient delivery of legal services. Sylvie heads a team of lawyers, librarians, document management technicians and knowledge management specialists whose mandate is to develop state-of-the-art systems, services and resources to assist the firm’s lawyers and clients, and to leverage the firm’s collective intellectual capital. Sylvie oversees the firm’s knowledge collection and provides advice to the practice groups on best practices for collecting, managing and accessing content. Prior to joining Fasken, Sylvie was Director of Knowledge Management, Infrastructure and Innovation at another major Canadian law firm and she also practiced as a partner for some fifteen years in the areas of business law, mergers and acquisitions and technology.
đź“Š GPT Features
- DALL-E: Generate realistic images and art with prompts.
- Web Browsing: Access up-to-date information with web browsing.
- File Upload: You can upload files to this GPT.
đź“š Browse Related GPTs
⚡️AI Productivity Bot⚡️
All-in-one coach for enhancing productivity with AI and ChatGPT, tailored for individuals and teams.
đź’¬ 90+ Chats
Co-Facilitator
I'm here to help you to design or plan gatherings, workshops, parties, games, and more!
đź’¬ 100+ Chats
Debate Facilitator
AI moderator balancing debate rules enforcement with flexibility and clear intervention.
đź’¬ 20+ Chats
UX Expert & Facilitator
Guides clients through UX design process, focusing on their business and product needs.
đź’¬ 5+ Chats
Telehealth Facilitator: Virtual Health Assistant
A friendly assistant for telehealth appointments 💻👨‍💻
đź’¬ 6+ Chats
Civic Engagement Facilitator
Encourages and educates on civic responsibilities, including voting and community involvement.
đź’¬ 7+ Chats
Focused Flow State Facilitator
Enables users to enter and maintain a state of flow for productivity through targeted exercises and environmental adjustments.
đź’¬ 10+ Chats
Flooring Facilitator
Expert in hardwood, tile, and carpet flooring. Offers advice on selection, installation, and maintenance.
đź’¬ 0+ Chats
🚀 Agile Sprint Facilitator Pro 🛠️
Your AI scrum master for tech project agility! 🚀 Provides sprint planning, backlog grooming & progress tracking. 📊 Stay on top of your projects! 🛠️
đź’¬ 2+ Chats
